From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 543FF3851C04; Sat, 9 May 2020 03:46:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 543FF3851C04 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588995973; bh=Av6qLqgCvNiBrZvYZ2fDGpg1yP2B8/jiTi6OqatGvbc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fSdaIh8J7t32h7VFa9KoNkt3/jlMyzSRtyiHx8BzkLymd2qpeTip6wBJJUcFXCWn6 j4AwIiMdB96nqoOp2AyGY+a9FjzWO0iT4uu3c2XSH20O9BPPhlkEemtLv76FMnU6Fj f22fXvnK7nqOBRA+Q0yO7qjjDdXxS0G8ak/fmPQI= From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/93372] cris performance regressions due to de-cc0 work Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 03:46:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 03:46:13 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93372 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- In https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/545452.html I mention= ed a performance-regression with coremark, from 5227456 cycles (with cc0) to 523= 8564 (CC_REG), which is about 0.21%.=