public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/93385] [10 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 14:11:59 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-93385-4-P7SA0V8PpT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-93385-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- For debug stmts, it would be best if we could use those DEBUG D#Y s=> parm DEBUG var => D#Y added in if (param_body_adjs && MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_BIND_STMTS). Though, if we remove already during the copy_bb by not actually creating the stmt, I'm afraid that will mean the debug info is lost (debug stmts will be reset), unless we for the lhs of to be dced stmts manually create debug temporaries and debug stmts when we remap_gimple_stmt those stmts (for SSA_NAMEs that are directly (or indirectly!) used in debug stmts). If we do what Martin was proposing instead, i.e. copy the stmts and then DCE them afterwards, it might work properly (perhaps only if we DCE them in the right order).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 14:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-93385-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2020-03-15 11:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-09 9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-17 11:50 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-17 12:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-17 12:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-17 12:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-17 12:16 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2020-04-17 13:41 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-17 13:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-17 14:00 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2020-04-17 14:00 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-17 14:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2020-04-17 14:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-20 8:14 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2020-04-20 9:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-20 21:02 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-21 10:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-21 13:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-04 12:03 ` [Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-07 11:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-28 12:33 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-06-08 18:18 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-27 15:04 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-26 12:01 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-21 15:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-12 12:51 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-30 13:12 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-27 13:35 ` [Bug ipa/93385] [10/11/12 " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-12 11:40 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-28 16:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-28 16:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-28 17:30 ` [Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-04 17:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-28 10:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-07 10:36 ` [Bug ipa/93385] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-14 20:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-29 8:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-29 9:16 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-29 9:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-93385-4-P7SA0V8PpT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).