From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 04CF639B8403; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:30:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 04CF639B8403 From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:30:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:30:05 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93385 Martin Jambor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] wrong |[10/11 Regression] wrong |code with u128 modulo at |code with u128 modulo at |-O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp |-O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp |-fno-tree-dce |-fno-tree-dce --- Comment #47 from Martin Jambor --- Fixed on master. Given the size of the fix, it is clearly not suitable for backporting. This bug is likely to remain unfixed on GCC 10 and 11, which however should not = hurt anybody who does not explicitly disable DCE. (An unappealing but realistic alternative is to add the bail out from comment #11 to those branches.)=