From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 940F9385DC1D; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:09:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 940F9385DC1D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587125399; bh=z+wvRjhbmPM4Y0JcFE4RnOifMXkbSnw8+l0DInkBAuM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eT8+I4hb84N2AGehnL85+oxsKR2lKErOZoNuOZArPfAS7HMCF9nmuh0eihhzAcRJn sCGFsHcso11MbYiZkQWT5i1serBmyWB3I6UkzOCn9r/ZIdbpEY/csm4Qz+i2WwVqQS PDzX0bAjEGv+EQwc+hC5TkvM5YBxgyMMwZ4yLOLg= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/93385] [10 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:09:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:09:59 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93385 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Looking at tree-ssa-dce.c, it uses remove_phi_node rather than gsi_remove f= or PHIs. And for non-PHIs, it calls release_defs after gsi_remove.=