From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 06E32386F460; Thu,  7 May 2020 13:56:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 06E32386F460
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588859768;
 bh=Q1qVrCaPPkqbryC+oCA1OA2X92spJq7Jz+6oCfX+wp8=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=vp5c7eYd99lCUxSrIZLOJyVXZfLxIxf8J08+YeZUmHpOSoWwl35GTRaq4pkBoXJDM
 XDL2g5/Et7rnk1/EL47ApPCACZsqK7yu5c41G+quCbhAGaHPm9R/unHe6EbZLyZRWU
 IfrRFH+nDBR8XUhuz28qX7IVwwxKs4gNkva8JIUw=
From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/93431] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval9.C  -std=c++2a
 (test for excess errors)
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 13:56:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on cf_gcctarget cc
Message-ID: <bug-93431-4-iirDCjrE5N@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93431-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93431-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 13:56:08 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93431

Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2020-01-27 00:00:00         |2020-5-7
             Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11       |hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 nvptx
                 CC|                            |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg

--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Supposedly same issue for nvptx target, where as of somewhere in
cff5a231480526aa73094a22fe8b2f39b63735a4..c416c52bcdb120db5e8c53a51bd78c436=
0daf79b
we got the regression:

    UNSUPPORTED: g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval9.C  -std=3Dc++98
    UNSUPPORTED: g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval9.C  -std=3Dc++14
    UNSUPPORTED: g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval9.C  -std=3Dc++17
    PASS: g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval9.C  -std=3Dc++2a (test for excess erro=
rs)
    [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval9.C  -std=3Dc++2a executio=
n test

    spawn [...]/nvptx-none-run-single ./lambda-uneval9.exe
    error   : Multiple definition of '_ZZ7counterIZ1fvEUlvE_EivE3cnt' in 'i=
nput
file 2 at offset 4789', first defined in 'input file 1 at offset 1796'
    nvptx-run: cuLinkAddData failed: unknown error (CUDA_ERROR_UNKNOWN, 999=
)=