From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CA60C3858404; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:44:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CA60C3858404
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1661953440;
	bh=YBZPCwJRetboZk/dWOybF0kVA8XfkdG4ni4TlYwlL8w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=pv+KciH34it3tsepI2G01SS+GT9qzwc8IIFxjTOszK+B0cb1moTTCsxRCKRR6qWKF
	 HKnS+GThdhryFKp0kEwAv0SWwvG73Vg6CDlqWLpCUfCmpWcy/87HIJIJQqWE+FuFXZ
	 sEN9Dd+YK/6aDNYoaSAdle1fGE78DK1Z7IlznwPA=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/93432] variable is used uninitialized, but
 gcc shows no warning
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:44:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component keywords
Message-ID: <bug-93432-4-Or2ZZlZbnc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93432

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|c                           |tree-optimization
           Keywords|easyhack                    |

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It works by chance when optimizing but not optimizing too much.  -O3 unrolls
the loop and runs into CCP aka PR18501, we get

  <bb 2> [local count: 97603129]:
  if (y_5(D) <=3D 9)
    goto <bb 18>; [33.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 19>; [67.00%]

  <bb 18> [local count: 32209032]:
  _11 =3D z_6(D) + 1;

  <bb 19> [local count: 97603129]:
  # prephitmp_17 =3D PHI <2(2), _11(18)>

and CCP says _11 is UNDEFINED and merges it with 2 to 2.  For me even GCC 9=
.3.1
warns, so does GCC 7.5, both even with -O3.

We do not warn at -O0 but that's by design - we think doing the predicate b=
ased
uninit analysis early (on the unoptimized IL) would be too noisy.=