From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B56913858291; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 20:16:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B56913858291
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1661717804;
	bh=hLEwAheSL8UV011Z/lmGB8E4TeKk5uZY71RWGvH7+lk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uvR/i30unAEiSdwEw0LLJiXKBnYkHqkabcqyvITCD+srAuNRQTWrRTb109bFOVFu3
	 gVgkpkWKWltdV6e9LaOOGjVlTu76hqhxKpRH4/5HLtlonprkusNNhHFBasa5Si2ib8
	 pSyrIXz5XsBx5z4qfmFcf4bFGL7VnsQ3szLOJMW4=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/93482] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor,
 at fortran/array.c:2096
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 20:16:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-93482-4-jtYou01OLh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93482-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93482-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93482

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> Seems to have been fixed on mainline, and backported to 11- and 10-branch.
> Likely a duplicate.

Some issues with zero-sized constructors as in comment#2 have been fixed for
pr103692.

There have been fixes for other issues with constructors, including nested
constructors.  I believe there is sufficient coverage for trivial cases like
those in this PR, and it would be beneficial to have a clean, separate PR
for remaining problems.  Closing this one.

Thanks for the report!=