From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C13C73858C39; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 19:55:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C13C73858C39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1665690928;
	bh=zdeyvNxorisKh7V2p4VMcrQg1uZyRxwdz3PPpmHqJv4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=aIcwXsdj6lhhkE/9C/6HOsJWwIAUAkbXXXqRL0sAkEaCqlLy3/4KJYu4J31HkvgBJ
	 h4S9zSHaOYbH33lHydwNSeDyv8SgJUPe+rqefnEesqmWxQtOrclPdekHgFUP/mZSyc
	 TC/dG8gVxKFZ+7QgOku8lLFRxN37fMeO8vBg8LY0=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/93483] ICE in gfc_constructor_copy, at
 fortran/constructor.c:103
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 19:55:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-93483-4-BIRaJKNYA9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93483

--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #11)
> Here is an example, where the array simplifies using the host-associated
> parameter value instead of calling the contained function with the same n=
ame
> hiding it.  It is admittedly somewhat artificial.

But it is a valid (counter-)example ... :-(

Symptoms: invalid declarations, such as

    real :: b(1) =3D [ real :: (a(1)) ]

or

    real, parameter :: b(1) =3D [ real :: (a(1)) ]

are not diagnosed, also not by the Intel compiler, but by NAG:

Error: pr93483-mm.f90, line 6: Reference to non-intrinsic function A in
constant expression

So this looks like a can of worms...=