From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0FA4F3858C56; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 20:02:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0FA4F3858C56
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1665691376;
	bh=nENcU1YqUQCUOswWdTK0bz5+uYrRXfr/oezl7BTSC7U=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YifVU1Q4AfPztwxUcEvIwPzrn8laAQexZydsbg7tOG5q7R7mw8f659eLOP9DmTX6U
	 76GVQ5246j3lSxdZhBhijT70WNmWdR5obfbDsf7Dr1eQFmApU0YY5125iZdDaUTous
	 nPkUFfREAmpWgSqIZ0Z0jc3EaPj1iq2lLhnuDzDU=
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/93483] ICE in gfc_constructor_copy, at
 fortran/constructor.c:103
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 20:02:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-93483-4-x3EkDwtR86@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93483

--- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> =
---
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 07:35:30PM +0000, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>=20
> --- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #8)
> > If regtesting complete ok, and Mikael doesn't find any additional
> > problems.  Please commit.
>=20
> Unfortunately, I think there is one problem.
> Generally speaking, I don't like doing too much at parsing stage, and
> especially simplifying.  It's too early in my opinion.
>=20
> Here is an example, where the array simplifies using the host-associated
> parameter value instead of calling the contained function with the same n=
ame
> hiding it.  It is admittedly somewhat artificial.
>=20

If might be artificial, but "wrong code" is not a pleasant
side effect.

There is array.cc:gfc_resolve_array_constructor().  I haven't
looked to see when, or even if, this is called when compiling
the examples that Gerhard, Harald, and you have devised.=