public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/93542] std::future::wait_for should use monotonic clock
[not found] <bug-93542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-06-05 11:57 ` mac at mcrowe dot com
2020-10-03 16:27 ` mac at mcrowe dot com
2020-10-05 9:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mac at mcrowe dot com @ 2020-06-05 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93542
--- Comment #2 from Mike Crowe <mac at mcrowe dot com> ---
An updated version of the fix is available in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2020-May/050433.html which relies on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2020-May/050439.html .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/93542] std::future::wait_for should use monotonic clock
[not found] <bug-93542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-06-05 11:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/93542] std::future::wait_for should use monotonic clock mac at mcrowe dot com
@ 2020-10-03 16:27 ` mac at mcrowe dot com
2020-10-05 9:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mac at mcrowe dot com @ 2020-10-03 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93542
Mike Crowe <mac at mcrowe dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Mike Crowe <mac at mcrowe dot com> ---
The patches mentioned in comment 2 landed for GCC 11 as
87fce1923fcc8d6ef508500475c149082dc9d338 and
01d412ef36f56c6961858f4d3d395d000e3f1c06 respectively. It seems that I failed
to include the bug number in the commit message. :(
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/93542] std::future::wait_for should use monotonic clock
[not found] <bug-93542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-06-05 11:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/93542] std::future::wait_for should use monotonic clock mac at mcrowe dot com
2020-10-03 16:27 ` mac at mcrowe dot com
@ 2020-10-05 9:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-05 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93542
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks, Mike. I've added the PR number to the ChangeLog file in
g:b98d3cc5666f36bf3cbeed7cd6a23483cc5e4eca
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-05 9:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-93542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-06-05 11:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/93542] std::future::wait_for should use monotonic clock mac at mcrowe dot com
2020-10-03 16:27 ` mac at mcrowe dot com
2020-10-05 9:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).