public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libfortran/93550] Implement control of leading zero in formatted numeric output [not found] <bug-93550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2020-07-14 8:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2023-10-13 19:46 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-05 3:37 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2020-07-14 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93550 Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2020-07-14 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > A truly wish the standards committee would stop inventing these unnecessary > features. I hope they vote it out. Agreed. In any case I think we should wait for the standard before doing anything for it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/93550] Implement control of leading zero in formatted numeric output [not found] <bug-93550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2020-07-14 8:27 ` [Bug libfortran/93550] Implement control of leading zero in formatted numeric output dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2023-10-13 19:46 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-05 3:37 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-10-13 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93550 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I am going to add this to my list since we are now going through the 2018 compliance matrix. I will update this as I get these sorted out. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/93550] Implement control of leading zero in formatted numeric output [not found] <bug-93550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2020-07-14 8:27 ` [Bug libfortran/93550] Implement control of leading zero in formatted numeric output dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2023-10-13 19:46 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-05 3:37 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-05 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93550 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The LEADING_ZERO specifiers are now included in the 2023 standard, so away we go! In support of lazy programmers lets make the compiler do it. ;) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-05 3:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-93550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-07-14 8:27 ` [Bug libfortran/93550] Implement control of leading zero in formatted numeric output dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2023-10-13 19:46 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-05 3:37 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).