From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2D6F53857024; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:02:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2D6F53857024 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1594983779; bh=9KLlHy0yIKEx7MgV/7in4ZCB+Zymrg04ofRRN8eTOKU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xNeePfFntBEW8ovxw0gKmTUmxDAewz8Hc07uUIOa9kTRDX0ThqAkz9LMq+1bthNZr oJahAJt0lEE5DWmWVIp5dMYIp04GUYtXw+gOlIUjl81lPiSxaJWdKe/nGNlf+rCSuX ZwnL4/pivkuYIZWRiVLEeb77xOiqPE0zzGik+Gzg= From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/93553] ICE in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.c:3485 Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:02:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:02:59 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93553 Tobias Burnus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- Slightly simplified one can use a scalar 'c' instead of an array. One gets (-fdump-tree-gimple): #pragma omp parallel reduction(+:x) shared(c) { integer(kind=3D8) D.3933; integer(kind=3D8) D.3934; #pragma omp for nowait private(i) for (i =3D 1; i <=3D 8; i =3D i + 1) { D.3933 =3D (integer(kind=3D8)) i; D.3934 =3D D.3933 + -1; (*x)[D.3934] =3D c; During omp-lowering, one has: =E2=80=A6 D.3924 =3D S.0 + -1; D.3940 =3D x; (*D.3940)[D.3924] =3D 0; The "D.3940 =3D x;" is processed and the "D.3940" ends up as "tp" argument = to "scan_omp_1_op" which calls then in turn: tree repl =3D remap_decl (t, &ctx->cb) The latter then calls omp_copy_decl and returns error_mark_node =E2=86=92 this gives then the gcc_assert in sca= n_omp1_op. By contrast, "S.0" appears in ctx->cb->decl_map and, hence, omp_copy_decl is not called for it.=