From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 650D33858C3A; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:44:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 650D33858C3A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1689086670; bh=RNK7SmlhJLoWnzkX1uAh3+QmhaR/ufaq3WR7QYIhlUE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HlROnxJ+EY+O7NbvCZHo/Y7G03o0EcoezHU5JSqhgwVKayfT8HvqbJmg+N1pbFqkj CsMeju+7ZLf6r/AfAuTwDIcID47pJAgYbZ2C+QVDheKtFAn7jpTVpksstWurunFUAD 3gpPT1j1zXVyoIA38h2+xVRkEx8BeaFDCV40SVeA= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/93595] [c++20] function call, substitution failure of template paramter with a lambda default in template context Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:44:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93595 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Ted Lyngmo from comment #6) > @Andrew Pinski: Shouldn't the status be "CONFIRMED" rather than "NEW"? There is status called confirmed but rather rhe new status is the confirmed state.=