From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 20CE63858410; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:55:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 20CE63858410
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711364118;
	bh=wRLW11o0S2nBwm20ZsMLP3Oaz3/VtffB/5pWbM8TWEI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=X8C/NDfkpYd5rJTMUnVp2Iqh3YUpn6C8aAfM40n8VH0rIfYzHOMhj27h/NmQRXKYj
	 OSHcQVOHaQsOjHuXRQWZKoFt1kV4w9F7cYlYi3q0yMkZIq5AOYQikf0XMlfbJX5uuN
	 yxJze5waGKzwfLZcQleJHMffuzwFbw08ZOnxyS1A=
From: "andrea.agostini.sax at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/93595] [c++20] function call, substitution failure of
 template parameter with a lambda default in template context
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:55:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: andrea.agostini.sax at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-93595-4-HQygLZEMIm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93595

Andrea Agostini <andrea.agostini.sax at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |andrea.agostini.sax at gma=
il dot c
                   |                            |om

--- Comment #9 from Andrea Agostini <andrea.agostini.sax at gmail dot com> =
---
While trying to work around this, I massaged the code enough for the compil=
er
to produce a more interesting message: see https://godbolt.org/z/Gsbv8fG7M

Adding a return statement to the lambda makes the compiler confess that it
thinks the lambda should return int, rather than void. Maybe this can help
pinpoint the bug?=