From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A51EF3858C33; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:42:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A51EF3858C33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1689086559; bh=ftoEGevIFtlX/7LRQRA76dpy2Up+apl3G3h0IutdxC0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YehQQXSaq5U6sq14lNL+MTs5x7AnnfJz8hHAEZ0dyaDNucUCJ/R5OCEz7u2Xw36Aq /JbJ4FyM6u+AMphyrYcMQehYMC/79qKbPyhxUW5d+AAAVEweW1yynWnFlNSJSsCgXm nh0PYZvd0zW9T4lFxJJkWt5VZmym9GMjxZ7JyvNM= From: "ted at lyncon dot se" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/93595] [c++20] function call, substitution failure of template paramter with a lambda default in template context Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:42:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ted at lyncon dot se X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93595 --- Comment #6 from Ted Lyngmo --- @Andrew Pinski: Shouldn't the status be "CONFIRMED" rather than "NEW"?=