From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 030F9384E209; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:14:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 030F9384E209 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1670890453; bh=EhEgd8drkX6MEkreQb6gAcecU28D3/dfqJvIPMgv6qI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EgJla8NXzcDUve64RHU+CvHLAwb6v3X6qg+fz6zunABaM0zi3rOXNtSq9lFSXx2BU arK6b/gULmsuxwfcxxYj2Qjh6RMahB4mYfP5hdEa3ncQBn6jJ8DE97z12Ku+owlk1r DUtdMm5G/gTFNL35u6ZxnLcrmpGU5WBY5VlF8pC0= From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11/12/13 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:14:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93644 --- Comment #22 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to George R. Goffe from comment #20) > Hi, >=20 > I'm seeing this message from the "current" findutils. > Likewise with libiconv. > What is the solution? One hasn't been figured out yet; just use -Wno-cpp and -Wno-return-local-ad= dr for now, I guess...=