* [Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC eliminates conditions it should not, when strict-enums is on
[not found] <bug-93674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-04-09 8:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-18 17:05 ` law at redhat dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-09 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93674
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Bin Cheng <amker@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed80b385418f97ef087f3f2bbe1abecffb5c9775
commit r10-7650-ged80b385418f97ef087f3f2bbe1abecffb5c9775
Author: Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu Apr 9 16:42:48 2020 +0800
Add unsigned type iv_cand for iv_use with non mode-precision type
Precisely, for iv_use if it's not integer/pointer type, or non-mode
precision type, add candidate for the corresponding scev in unsigned
type with the same precision, rather than its original type.
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/93674
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (langhooks.h): New include.
(add_iv_candidate_for_use): For iv_use of non integer or pointer type,
or non-mode precision type, add candidate in unsigned type with the
same precision.
gcc/testsuite/
PR tree-optimization/93674
* g++.dg/pr93674.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC eliminates conditions it should not, when strict-enums is on
[not found] <bug-93674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-04-09 8:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC eliminates conditions it should not, when strict-enums is on cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-04-18 17:05 ` law at redhat dot com
2020-04-20 9:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9 " rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2020-04-18 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93674
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Should be fixed by the commit referenced in c#15.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9 Regression] GCC eliminates conditions it should not, when strict-enums is on
[not found] <bug-93674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-04-09 8:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC eliminates conditions it should not, when strict-enums is on cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-18 17:05 ` law at redhat dot com
@ 2020-04-20 9:30 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-20 11:17 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-20 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93674
Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|FIXED |---
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] GCC |[8/9 Regression] GCC
|eliminates conditions it |eliminates conditions it
|should not, when |should not, when
|strict-enums is on |strict-enums is on
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
--- Comment #17 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Has not been backported yet.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9 Regression] GCC eliminates conditions it should not, when strict-enums is on
[not found] <bug-93674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-20 9:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9 " rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-04-20 11:17 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-04 6:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: amker at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-20 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93674
--- Comment #18 from bin cheng <amker at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #17)
> Has not been backported yet.
Will do it. Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9 Regression] GCC eliminates conditions it should not, when strict-enums is on
[not found] <bug-93674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-20 11:17 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-04 6:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-04 8:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-04 14:54 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-04 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93674
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Bin Cheng <amker@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28d68fde77363520d64b2a7ea480040cf7cb004d
commit r9-8561-g28d68fde77363520d64b2a7ea480040cf7cb004d
Author: Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon May 4 14:28:54 2020 +0800
Add unsigned type iv_cand for iv_use with non mode-precision type
Precisely, for iv_use if it's not integer/pointer type, or non-mode
precision type, add candidate for the corresponding scev in unsigned
type with the same precision, rather than its original type.
Backport from master.
2020-04-09 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com>
PR tree-optimization/93674
gcc/
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (langhooks.h): New include.
(add_iv_candidate_for_use): For iv_use of non integer or pointer type,
or non-mode precision type, add candidate in unsigned type with the
same precision.
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/pr93674.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9 Regression] GCC eliminates conditions it should not, when strict-enums is on
[not found] <bug-93674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-04 6:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-04 8:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-04 14:54 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-04 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93674
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Bin Cheng <amker@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:386f23b84aafbdb43701b5a50ebe2dc1f4e6201f
commit r8-10234-g386f23b84aafbdb43701b5a50ebe2dc1f4e6201f
Author: Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon May 4 16:56:34 2020 +0800
Add unsigned type iv_cand for iv_use with non mode-precision type
Precisely, for iv_use if it's not integer/pointer type, or non-mode
precision type, add candidate for the corresponding scev in unsigned
type with the same precision, rather than its original type.
Backport from master.
2020-04-09 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com>
PR tree-optimization/93674
gcc/
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (langhooks.h): New include.
(add_iv_candidate_for_use): For iv_use of non integer or pointer type,
or non-mode precision type, add candidate in unsigned type with the
same precision.
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/pr93674.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/93674] [8/9 Regression] GCC eliminates conditions it should not, when strict-enums is on
[not found] <bug-93674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-04 8:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-04 14:54 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-04 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93674
Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #21 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Now fixed on all live branches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread