From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EE3113858C62; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 16:51:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EE3113858C62 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1686243087; bh=5m4f2gTzEAXnMqmIeBrEUrBs/CoG24mCG1e5PM6+Yi4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IbAKcjqf/aFfyBhafC19rEclKCieTsZLb1KXWLUR9Wl+vBFOzG4uq0orzs3MN6scK Xlnypru/c5nIe85xXbuBev5jL43vkQTbZXXY6ey2/oHXh4tblWJ7ew/46qpmoYayWv svYVxoerte/MPdqZ6EMI5sGr5M6EnBrQZ2ftNfMM= From: "jbeulich at suse dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/93768] Use vpternlog for composite logical operations Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2023 16:51:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeulich at suse dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93768 jbeulich at suse dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jbeulich at suse dot com --- Comment #3 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- (In reply to ak from comment #2) > Most of it is already done as part of PR101989 "Most" really is just one 3rd of what was reported here, isn't it? 101989 is solely about "Three-input simple logicals" (beyond the small set mentioned here). In particular I haven't seen gcc do what is requested here as "Two-i= nput inverted logicals" (I don't think I properly understand the 3rd item about = ?:, as I can't imagine it's meant to apply to a vector of individual bits), prompting me to start working on some patches. Was marking the report here = as duplicate really appropriate?=