From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id F0B68385828D; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:56:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F0B68385828D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1665608161; bh=NGdZXqTxjAWNmSJpSbbDDAoF/ICGaXP0a7yFZaGtwbw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JYHajRcQ06X0OWa5/Y2DtM3GjYAn8ivVebWxzBAxvMcGwWK+AbiAwRxsDlY4Pkmau RQ+RFEvRO8+MUdJYOmKIl70IPXJ8rTxEvFQzePxFDY4/To2ATmj6i09dt4bTssSIZP 3VtAnqu12J+glug557QW5GApm0Wz8GlhlOjlx4rg= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/93821] Define __cplusplus to 202002L in C++20 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:56:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93821 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- No. C++20 support in GCC 10 is missing a number of features, so it would be misleading/incorrect to define it to 202002L. https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx20 You can just test for > 201703L if you want to know if partial C++20 suppor= t is present. Or use the feature test macros for individual features.=