From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 9777E387606C; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 10:13:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9777E387606C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1584872034;
 bh=TKFfKm2G/Op6hZWBACyWQrWKcmj0HM4L8CvanTd0gsY=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=vLtI+egQ2kByaZiBVuXHlUU1soVc1aV/X0zvOVRBA8zQf8kQeIBcVVloEvwMvKpK5
 bDQ4vsFYLTFZusfQ7MpI8g28VrW1azGmZNGcEU8fO9+VchTuQe2e27uS8PHKNpWg/h
 s0B/HvI4+9BG1Gp3Z/wTBEnxSieq4L4u9buTgKYw=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/93873] gcc or lto-wrapper does not consider
 individual bitfield values on static analysis and instead tests the whole
 value of all bitfield bits combined
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 10:13:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-93873-4-FS3vgP4q71@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-93873-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-93873-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 10:13:54 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93873

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It is not going to be fixed in GCC 9, only in 10, where it should be fixed
already.=