From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 583F63944438; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:51:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 583F63944438
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1584535895;
 bh=e4XqmTxMA4rP7+6JDiT6Q8Yo0cYo33u03rC5U5m3m1A=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=JJCQPm7Jv0PC/yrPJrF+O59AD3spsd0zE+gn+by4dNtZ0jniZ8pmaqe3Ygh4rahzO
 3Mt8OH4NNSOH5vu/VMhKnf/K+YPiKlyIc7nJ93FZS0vt4nrEoKqOo56l4Lq8cioU4T
 AygDDGspywbzkCe/OOglkQAGeiAnMHHSb95EUiDY=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/94029] [9/10 Regression] gcc crash in
 coverage.c:655 since r9-4216-g390e529e2b98983d
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:51:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94029-4-SnWRc4NivC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94029-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94029-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:51:35 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94029

--- Comment #11 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Created attachment 48053 [details]
> gcc10-pr94029.patch
>=20
> The problem is that C FE finish_function uses input_location as
> cfun->function_end_locus, but input_location isn't really updated very of=
ten
> in the C FE anymore, mostly in the line change hooks but that doesn't
> trigger here because the macro arguments span across newline.
> So, either like in the completely untested patch we can update
> input_location somewhat more often, or we'd need to propagate the locatio=
n_t
> of the closing }
> from c_parser_compound_statement_nostart to the callers.

Thank you very much Jakub. If it survives regression tests, I would install=
 the
suggested patch.=