public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload [not found] <bug-94039-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2021-09-09 8:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-20 17:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-08 0:23 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-09 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94039 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2021-09-09 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- [expr.cond]/6 I think applies here. Confirmed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload [not found] <bug-94039-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-09-09 8:18 ` [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-20 17:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-08 0:23 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-20 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94039 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sbence92 at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- *** Bug 100800 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload [not found] <bug-94039-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-09-09 8:18 ` [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-20 17:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-10-08 0:23 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com @ 2023-10-08 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94039 Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com> --- You can also hit this with a lambda, which of course is isomorphic to Andre's test case: void (*a)() = true ? []{} : nullptr; Bug #88458 ("GCC rejects (true ? 0 : nullptr)") might be tangentially related. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-08 0:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-94039-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-09-09 8:18 ` [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-20 17:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-08 0:23 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).