public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload
[not found] <bug-94039-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-09-09 8:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-20 17:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-08 0:23 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-09 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94039
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2021-09-09
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
[expr.cond]/6 I think applies here.
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload
[not found] <bug-94039-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-09-09 8:18 ` [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-20 17:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-08 0:23 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-20 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94039
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sbence92 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 100800 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload
[not found] <bug-94039-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-09-09 8:18 ` [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-20 17:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-10-08 0:23 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com @ 2023-10-08 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94039
Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com> ---
You can also hit this with a lambda, which of course is isomorphic to Andre's
test case:
void (*a)() = true ? []{} : nullptr;
Bug #88458 ("GCC rejects (true ? 0 : nullptr)") might be tangentially related.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-08 0:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-94039-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-09-09 8:18 ` [Bug c++/94039] conditional operator fails to use proper overload pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-20 17:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-08 0:23 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).