From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6886E394BE31; Mon,  9 Mar 2020 14:48:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6886E394BE31
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1583765332;
 bh=rMWfvg8gUhglihz02BEmBWiftWrLJUvLM+Hmq6LIklI=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=RovW5tjkvUHDruZO/jkX5jychNFCJ42aqGHihxoaNgMotu0c5k5SJ2xlY7nyTy7cg
 7K4pDV6gbWctHu+ew4Z9nJTBcEuag3TUbaLnyyAg12znnCZTyn0JAPtZeh1ThzI2Q/
 7622a5WFixRCJK9qip/nJJmcwmDqF+LdjBxZ3AQs=
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/94042] [10 Regression] Bootstrap fails on ppc-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:48:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code, ra, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94042-4-Um41IGiIS4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94042-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94042-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:48:52 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94042

--- Comment #34 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #29)
> Sorry for all the troubles with my latest patch and thank you for fair
> criticism.  I've decided to revert the patch as soon as git starts workin=
g.=20
> I'll work to find a better solution after this.

Thanks!  Btw, on powerpc64-linux your patch changed the allocation order
of the non-volatile registers, which is a big regression (we need bigger
stack frames that way).=