From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0D726385DC01; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 06:56:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0D726385DC01 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585724167; bh=+Cjz8sOAHADfm6QQzskKIVVd0m98+jYZRrsGH+/Kf7k=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jO7yhhk1fm5VH5+3h1EgonVOyLm4asSUrrR52Tp7U/HPk7EdBwTczP0LF8+0uQWFE rTyjzTn1bQ0cLZXzNeq9f4NXf8Zuip8wN+oUXj5cGu89xYy8PFP7u4w1ZuaiAE410k oPrl46P2P79W4NpAvLXirtn9vYAkdhPtALlwrBfQ= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94043] [9 Regression] ICE in superloop_at_depth, at cfgloop.c:78 Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 06:56:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority cf_known_to_work short_desc bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 06:56:07 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94043 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work| |10.0 Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE in |[9 Regression] ICE in |superloop_at_depth, at |superloop_at_depth, at |cfgloop.c:78 |cfgloop.c:78 Status|RESOLVED |ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener --- Re-open. It's marked as broken in GCC 9 so a backport is in oder (if the i= ssue really reproduces there).=