From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 285163944417; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 02:49:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 285163944417 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1584499764; bh=w+jdON116byEC4o02Bib126QlNNaMVvwItdEjZflc98=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xavLgvlqm/Inh9wYZtf1YNdee6qPQZ5XkpyYt3yiMYG3zcB9aILECkjGrjgmtbrVp STEBorUA0ypHDp2P7iddJ04lEoBxo1BDKyk46q34Sr391srpk/2OHfmDD8eftfgTBc SU+q0AcWVao5fe1bi1URwNqEkIXtKpdKBSPtvP10= From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94043] [9/10 Regression] ICE in superloop_at_depth, at cfgloop.c:78 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 02:49:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 02:49:24 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94043 Kewen Lin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gn= u.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin --- Yes, very likely to just expose one latent bug, anyway I'll have a first lo= ok.=