From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D6255385F01D; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:42:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D6255385F01D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1584621727; bh=88UbKkK7VzJUt7zPFzancZ9bHjN/cTpZHqE1zhhkXfU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UlvSyrZ7Z06MGXL2eE8RmOHNvckrZSVNHmDJNgHLwtMIBNS6RDyDl6U7RCF2YanTF MTgweAy49RpoKLM0+hzaIKX7Pj5+2OdsXMtJufgtrTcCNnNRA60RBOcDll0T7JhK5v s1glOp/opqR2UjRYjPz57cPux2JZwOsusTU821Zw= From: "m.cencora at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94062] Cannot construct tuple from convertible types Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:42:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: m.cencora at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:42:07 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94062 --- Comment #9 from m.cencora at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > No, we can switch to using a data member with the [[no_unique_address]] > attribute, which is on my TODO list for gcc-11. See PR 55713 and PR 93147 Good. Besides this, do you plan: - to make the impl use 'non-recursive' base classes, - to guarantee LTR-ordered construction of tuple elements ?=