public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/94066] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE (starting/ending union member lifetime) in cxx_eval_bare_aggregate, at cp/constexpr.c:3790 since r6-7592
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 13:51:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-94066-4-LDpVx1emNx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-94066-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94066

--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b599bf9d6d1e180d350b71e51e08a66a1bb1546a

commit r10-7313-gb599bf9d6d1e180d350b71e51e08a66a1bb1546a
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Mar 19 09:58:28 2020 -0400

    c++: Reject changing active member of union during initialization [PR94066]

    This patch adds a check to detect changing the active union member during
    initialization of another member of the union in cxx_eval_store_expression.
 It
    uses the CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING flag as a proxy for whether the non-empty
    CONSTRUCTOR of UNION_TYPE we're assigning to is in the process of being
    initialized.

    This patch additionally fixes an issue in reduced_constant_expression_p
where we
    were returning false for an uninitialized union with no active member. 
This
    lets us correctly reject the uninitialized use in the testcase
    testconstexpr-union4.C that we weren't before.

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/94066
            * constexpr.c (reduced_constant_expression_p) [CONSTRUCTOR]:
Properly
            handle unions without an initializer.
            (cxx_eval_component_reference): Emit a different diagnostic when
the
            constructor element corresponding to a union member is NULL.
            (cxx_eval_bare_aggregate): When constructing a union, always set
the
            active union member before evaluating the initializer.  Relax
assertion
            that verifies the index of the constructor element we're
initializing
            hasn't been changed.
            (cxx_eval_store_expression): Diagnose changing the active union
member
            while the union is in the process of being initialized.  After
setting
            an active union member, clear CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING on the
underlying
            CONSTRUCTOR.
            (cxx_eval_constant_expression) [PLACEHOLDER_EXPR]: Don't re-reduce
a
            CONSTRUCTOR returned by lookup_placeholder.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/94066
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-union2.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-union3.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-union4.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-union5.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr94066.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr94066-2.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr94066-3.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-union1.C: New test.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-21 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-94066-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-08 16:41 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-08 16:54 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-09 14:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-09 15:55 ` hstong at ca dot ibm.com
2020-03-16 13:13 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-21 13:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-03-24 15:35 ` [Bug c++/94066] [8/9 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14  9:53 ` [Bug c++/94066] [9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01  8:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-94066-4-LDpVx1emNx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).