From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1E111394B026; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:30:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1E111394B026 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1583764216; bh=XSJh3h/xpE6gZ9BQ3B/GW+g8HSQFyDscUTsY3J51LP4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lBIaFtqqXP31QbSPrjmtnbj4dSMiJhsjjRkDkLov/bYDN7IEppbu1pe1D3qy7fvmK AzHhW0tvpZs1eLq4TvfThLOV6lFEbZORtecZh4EwZqtuWJUYzkVWAdPauAIPGmdMXX 7n9OvguRKCynSou0PAkInyCSs9JCv7akeK4rPSGU= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94066] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE (starting/ending union member lifetime) in cxx_eval_bare_aggregate, at cp/constexpr.c:3790 since r6-7592 Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:30:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:30:16 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94066 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- The standard seems to say a union member becomes active when the constructor finishes, not when it starts, so what wording prevents changing the active member during the construction?=