From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id AF9223851C0D; Thu,  1 Jul 2021 22:55:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AF9223851C0D
From: "sandra at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBmb3J0cmFuLzk0MDcwXSBBc3N1bWVkLXJhbmsgYXJyYXlz?=
 =?UTF-8?B?IOKAkyBib3VuZHMgbWlzaGFuZGxlZCwgU0laRS9TSEFQRS9VQk9VTkQvTEJP?=
 =?UTF-8?B?VU5E?=
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 22:55:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-94070-4-P7BsvofdgJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94070-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94070-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 22:55:52 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94070

sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think the remaining bind(c) problems are the same bug that is causing
failures in tests

interoperability/cf-out-descriptor-6.f90
interoperability/fc-descriptor-6.f90
interoperability/fc-out-descriptor-6.f90
interoperability/ff-descriptor-6.f90
intrinsics/size.f90

from the new TS29113 testsuite posted at

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/574115.html

TS29113 says:

  (1) for an assumed-rank object that is associated with an=20
      assumed-size array, the result has the value =E2=88=921 if DIM is=20
      present and equal to the rank of ARRAY

Also in the description of CFI_cdesc_t in section 8.3.3, it says

  In a C descriptor of an assumed-size array, the extent member of the
  last element of the dim member has the value =E2=88=921.

Neither of these things appears to be happening.=20=20

This might also be related to PR 94289?=