From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 130E43858D33; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 19:49:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 130E43858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709063360;
	bh=xnLbGfupeQrKIPVlfxb0MsbZF3r7q6Dlzlk+DFuOtPg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=RZJHbcX5pxYq+MqEQdYfWoL8XTCeZ8OU3GlgHrLebLIy579cC5eDZQLdehdnzTuxt
	 4lyzKXLNea9F5GNPAeC1GaH9XiDtEx/6ZGlUKQWK9gAN6FbKDLKZ2X9WFIoepIMLfG
	 UJVq9e9V0rtIH64MUm55WNQNxVvKbt3A0yh8ZQh8=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/94083] inefficient soft-float x!=Inf code
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 19:49:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-94083-4-q6nrAIawe1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94083-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94083-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94083

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-02-27
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. Also happens with _Float128 on x86_64 since that is a soft-float=
 fp
type too.=