From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DC9B83858C98; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:33:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DC9B83858C98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709116401;
	bh=M54MryjQibQBxGQs/2+LbuIsaCfH0dYnTVJrE0Ei4XM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wK40qybnhdZ4jSH64vxTAn9PKE1QMuqJoqNCNi6HUIRfFB1qEM5/2C1EzFo2F/mVW
	 JhXrSyGFpxYQHJ5oL6LJGYcWY36KKGGBoxThJmYs61c4NAHmP0vwNf7NFgbQuxE7NW
	 2ADaOFURIWpgulogCR8xqSZeSywAEtYXqxZGhs+U=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/94083] inefficient soft-float x!=Inf code
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:33:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94083-4-zO2lADkWhN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94083-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94083-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94083

--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, ok.  So then expansion should just concentrate on the fabs (x) <=3D nex=
tafter
(inf, 0) case for soft-float case and defer the rest to PR66462 which would
handle that much earlier.=