From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id A6172394441E; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:23:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A6172394441E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1584019413;
 bh=VDXVFnUFfVqOMsYRNhFdeT5of5EmtWB7h8vspPqXufo=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=JF19TS39p6rMjCkZVLQgbDmo4Gc4ki0R8+pXmbvXo+n5Dl5+PDE2sRajnh602+K2/
 Zlj5jfJ+t0irTMhQKwZuPxLxBnxW27XUF2psohoQAJIKTgEQMiCPC/I1nhE3exwGQQ
 YtxXd9OD8cAnLtnjLNWGLnYm9CUf+L7uYb/PGWWU=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/94103] Wrong optimization: reading value of a variable
 changes its representation for optimizer
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:23:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-94103-4-ERwwPsYiZJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94103-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94103-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:23:33 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94103

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|                            |9.3.0

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The old VN doesn't value-number unused defs so the actual testcase doesn't =
fail
there.  Still broken with GCC 9 though.  Adjusted testcases that actually
use the FP load would trigger with older compilers as well.=