From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 93BBF385DC32; Mon,  4 May 2020 09:27:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 93BBF385DC32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588584452;
 bh=W85CypG+lWBt+EwN8ckUOkYd+KwuxSVv1EVzdS5fLaM=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=nefdYtbf6dRYGSTd1T9hBLL63Cippqp0PIf2YHz+ywspBWhjD0ZH+1a3SwMBhBoGI
 qx1xun48dKH4wkFvZkaiVZDs9gVC93QE45gegK7pDt0MGCmFiFX5Y5tW4C3mQhJ/Ni
 QwFx8ew7U3XGA+9u4udVG+9CsbxyEO/G6o4DxgCQ=
From: "antony at cosmologist dot info" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/94109] Memory leak introduced in 8.3.0->8.3.1
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 09:27:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: antony at cosmologist dot info
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94109-4-6zSEVqM4HO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94109-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94109-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 09:27:32 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94109

--- Comment #3 from Antony Lewis <antony at cosmologist dot info> ---
Although my reduced test in the other id case is one problem, it appears th=
at
is not the only memory leak. Someone tested else on various gcc versions and
still found:

version    memory leak=20=20
7.3.0           no
8.2.0           no
7.5.0           yes
8.4.0           yes
9.2.0           yes
9.3.0           yes

So it certainly looks like a regression.=