From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D338A3877018; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:58:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D338A3877018 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1583913496; bh=dIloGMFvRGbvtpXZcSTPUFOzeb5lym6lm4FLUlk/3MA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dgbnvuY5VN0YB0ZNyvNgs//qf5PXzl5ETiErpims95H98QxedbnuBkotxwLoDs8Q3 GnLIfUWute3GSI9BDMJPpUlLC8ceByPfcHuXeI1qI8a02AEiHtWursa0tYE6QOnDSs bdp8y0T96IJbZHTF08wQP+El1gretuictkfRSWdA= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94130] [8/9/10 Regression] Unintended result with optimization option when assigning two structures, memset and 0 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:58:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:58:16 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94130 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Doing memset(&s_myvalue, 0, sizeof(s_myvalue)); s_myreq.m_data =3D &s_myvalue; also works around the issue. Odd.=