From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id CE7043877007; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:26:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CE7043877007
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1583915216;
 bh=z8HYmK4jmoIo7L8uWCdb5UbOCe/hQFLp0c2f5bbKKOU=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=a7aPbYeqfWFZqk7EhYmeRrcXZYQJ7OFCQMD0gQ61K7W7ebZTRLQQuqSFJ4IDNhxN6
 Xe8+zV7QsTd5eY4HLjC1NzTadLooWSq0DdXJZk5pafKI33P47ZthFjXIiCDR0ti6gc
 xTgHzohKsAl33694MFQ/fQRNPqYdh8UcWEtdPg+U=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/94134] pdp11-aout puts initial variable into .text
 section rather than .data
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:26:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-94134-4-CVQzjZHRt2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94134-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94134-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:26:56 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94134

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Well, in the testcase you've provided the variable isn't modified in any way
(nor used), so there is nothing wrong in optimizing it away completely or
putting it into a read-only section.
But say:
static volatile int zero =3D 0;
static volatile int one =3D 1;
int main () { zero++; one++; return 0; }
shows it is a real bug, assuming that the .text section is not modifiable on
pdp11-aout.=