From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3AAE2396ECFE; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:53:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3AAE2396ECFE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1590054783; bh=f1xMi1V0zldTXS8zvnu6ka/gigiruFD/XxnM6xi0uWU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oRGtuGo5wQaU+t7PCGSUd2T62GhRGuEr/ASLYptim+1vGatU8BJlmNgSDmKh2byZo 7wox0st4xFPgElXRzuXy7TTq2eoFEL9Wvh7rt2kRQx44WE8KjQ1fytz2fcuy3Ch/bk LEa9aKhHk8bczx/5wx19/kcX/yK1HF9AaDlGsV3w= From: "Laurent.Rineau__gcc at normalesup dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94141] c++20 rewritten operator== recursive call mixing friend and external operators for template class Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 09:53:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: Laurent.Rineau__gcc at normalesup dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: SUSPENDED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 09:53:03 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94141 --- Comment #4 from Laurent Rineau --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3) > It seems that this is as currently specified in C++20, but that some peop= le > are going to try and change the rules to avoid breaking code like this. Do you have reference to the discussion on the subject?=