From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 5831B385BF81; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:55:37 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5831B385BF81
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1586541337;
 bh=sNaov+jvL+nLPsD5nh89vCrlB7Hj9cKo9oB4N2l0Ypg=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=ncsCR1xanWxPUkmsKHMIXAaFiUcACeB828gH2TDe6ohV5OLl8hfIUCIdW5azUNahg
 O4lr0bGUUVOJYfYBtsQoLGfjmjoCYsZfKLcwEWjFCQRqnJ+8LoIPFhAXEAyOWye6Up
 H35rP3md9rwlR+mcykRUkItJTsn6R/HLp8r2dNUQ=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/94149] __is_constructible doesn't know about C++20
 parenthesized init for arrays
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:55:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94149-4-HGwjDFEmGA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94149-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94149-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:55:37 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94149

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpolacek@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62c25d7adb1a5664982449dda0e7f9ca63cf4735

commit r10-7681-g62c25d7adb1a5664982449dda0e7f9ca63cf4735
Author: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 9 16:31:59 2020 -0400

    c++: make __is_constructible work with paren-init of aggrs [PR94149]

    In C++20 this is well-formed:

      using T =3D int[2];
      T t(1, 2);

    which means that std::is_constructible_v<int[2], int, int> should be tr=
ue.
    But constructible_expr immediately returned the error_mark_node when it
    saw a list with more than one element.  To give accurate results in
    C++20, we have to try initializing the aggregate from a parenthesized l=
ist
of
    values.

    To not repeat the same mistake as in c++/93790, if there's only one
    element, I'm trying {} only when () didn't succeed.  is_constructible5.C
    verifies this.

    In paren-init24.C std::is_nothrow_constructible_v doesn't work due to
     error: invalid 'static_cast' from type 'int' to type 'int [1]'
    and
     error: functional cast to array type 'int [2]'

    This needs to be fixed in libstdc++.

            PR c++/94149
            * method.c (constructible_expr): In C++20, try using parenthesi=
zed
            initialization of aggregates to determine the result of
            __is_constructible.

            * g++.dg/cpp2a/paren-init24.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/paren-init25.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/ext/is_constructible5.C: New test.=