From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id D33553877027; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:25:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D33553877027
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1584278719;
 bh=NHTq0ozDfO4PMh3RowqBuyOIugn+d5uHcpo2w9n5okk=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=x3pdkisyOXGwTtAlf8RBtX+sOrLc0P0Q+arqXxXpqL3QFpIcbXQ7yjXkDiWXPVMw4
 On8yfEvxjscXeHtfpfVD9hSL4j3aUA6nPWfttNP/QX2kpJtjRX5h8FLUdtXTZ8KBlJ
 N6MEy5MjY3crarUgN/d+BjROkQhUMepbDi3BYSZ4=
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/94157] [10 Regression] error: lto-wrapper failed with
 -Wa,--noexecstack  -Wa,--noexecstack since r10-6807-gf1a681a174cdfb82
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:25:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-94157-4-ug1gFY6ynK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94157-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94157-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:25:19 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94157

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The new test FAILs on (at least) Solaris with the native assembler (and
probably
others like Darwin and HP-UX):

+FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr94157 c_lto_pr94157_0.o assemble,  -O0 -fipa-vrp -flto
-Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--execstack  -Wa,--execstack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execs=
tack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execs=
tack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack=20
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/pr94157 c_lto_pr94157_0.o-c_lto_pr94157_0.o execute=
=20
-O0 -fipa-vrp -flto -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--execstack=20
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execs=
tack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execs=
tack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack=20
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/pr94157 c_lto_pr94157_0.o-c_lto_pr94157_0.o link  -=
O0
-fipa-vrp -flto -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--execstack=20
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execs=
tack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execs=
tack
-Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack -Wa,--execstack=20

/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option '-'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option '-'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option 'e'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option 'xecstack'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option '-'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option 'e'^M
/usr/ccs/bin/as: error: unknown option 'xecstack'^M
[...]

Either use something portable here or restrict the test to assemblers suppo=
ring
--execstack/--noexecstack.=