From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 68026385E82C; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:05:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 68026385E82C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1584371135; bh=CBVGDfuQ80l2pFs19jUXvQ6kvzYG1sVhH67s/tyQ7ck=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=d8fNnaq31Dm4rrVfWrqDzOAGFvT3FV1K2ALPe48KS1o9HBt/5a7fHqFSRI4NeazK3 Wjgv28uS5bDj/9htWgRCoBnZ+a9451lsFPPb8WCr6JabiEZDr/X8rcQms+qJoKMAvo Y6z64ThqPTm+QkZHzgv3ECSXRG8By02Yx+Pt9IcY= From: "laurent.stacul at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/94164] [10 Regression] std::unintialized_fill_n fails to compile Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:05:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: laurent.stacul at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:05:35 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94164 Laurent Stacul changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Laurent Stacul --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > That's not an iterator. Okay. Thanks for the information. When all the requirements are written it works. Let's close this one. Regards, Stac=