From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B7033393742C; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:32:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B7033393742C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1584095554; bh=q08rwcWtwBMOi1iADPUXvMsypsPk3tQV4so9gxj8uao=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LmgeaArvBw/5aRSbChCr2zfcQhHpF5OWP5C+9m7qEpgVgdo2x/mRyawauFzST6iU1 JZHNt3rgpGLSnNKTwamgTojKAiUeUp0Ini3dYL/N3LKMbxI7kppHxcrP6gifiHumAo NBl5oTLtl03uS45PMmN9pVgUaGHE8OYSxn6RWUoI= From: "laurent.stacul at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/94164] [10 Regression] std::unintialized_fill_n fails to compile Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:32:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: laurent.stacul at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:32:34 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94164 --- Comment #2 from Laurent Stacul --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > That's not an iterator. Yes sure. I reduced my example to have the minimal example. I will add all = de needed requirement of an iterator if needed.=