From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1D218385DC08; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 07:52:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1D218385DC08 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585727543; bh=7pYH4B7vAbLp5ITvZ7zWT9w5tFmnAKQ67Hnxs+WSCr4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UwZSwt3+j6kvKpIn0k/HmycbFXJdmnbHCO/gfmT0H/38c42JlMJcw3Z5biLpcD+W2 SkGixDcp5DyF6KFqYY0e1H3SLpTUk3GL3/T7DqFW+yUHDe6e4h5u3uhJ1dEkxhNw2f aB4WlNFEYxCAuKE8FhhMhSSWDOTWC57uwvB6gBX8= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBwcmVwcm9jZXNzb3IvOTQxNjhdIFsxMCBSZWdyZXNzaW9u?= =?UTF-8?B?XSBlcnJvcjogZXh0ZW5kZWQgY2hhcmFjdGVyIMKnIGlzIG5vdCB2YWxpZCBp?= =?UTF-8?B?biBhbiBpZGVudGlmaWVyIHNpbmNlIHIxMC0zMzA5LWc3ZDExMmQ2NjcwYTBl?= =?UTF-8?B?MGU2?= Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 07:52:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 07:52:23 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94168 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- I read Josephs comment so that GCC is correct to reject the code and Martins quoting of the original testcase shows it's likely a genuine bug in the program (a typo of some sorts). Thus closing as INVALID. Please reopen if any of the above is wrong.=