From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 48572385E82C; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:59:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 48572385E82C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1584356371;
 bh=4dWXvnwPPTpWY+zbaDGkL7neqLSkf/7dfRp27sK4JsY=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=MVPAF5ELb609UN0CnbF2A4vJoP2kQ/EXcy0IUGhQhhAg9O3L5IywQvEnImmgtfiqW
 CyNHVSNYx98uAn2mWROQkbfgsskoCZ+K54XErjAuujyDem1XvcD1Jv+C4dHrEvwKYz
 ZZ/kXIwLv0SJUZkGad7lpRGlBDmzjX8AQrG3n/tk=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/94189] [9/10 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure on
 Wstringop-overflow-22.c since r9-3242
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:59:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-94189-4-ltvx2lCYUV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94189-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94189-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:59:31 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94189

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 48039
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D48039&action=3Dedit
gcc10-pr94189-2.patch

Another possible fix.  Don't optimize if we would emit a warning and don't =
emit
it just because the warning isn't enabled, -w or some other warning has been
emitted for the call already.  I think this is my preference.=