From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9B93A39450FB; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:43:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9B93A39450FB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1584557036; bh=0H9iY12Bsst3tpHBx3KW9PLM/qqf88j2DhuJYwjzwd4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nwjhIZ3cQKwQQndC2BBWUlN3vhzCwP8idfVTxYevlI3F/XQuqa/9R29g81G2Jc6Wg RiZQBNnEhXZL1MWLrvoy7TYw8//LwrFMjzR7KiK4GTk+GXa/Qx0xDTQNLEfdbQg9Eq +5cD1fbnjixfi3J2YPT9gCdXNWYeRx+lE+J6f7UM= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/94217] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_find_agg_cst_for_param, at ipa-prop.c:3467 since r10-7237-g4e3d3e40726e1b68 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:43:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:43:56 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94217 Marek Polacek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #1) > Hi Marin, > I've not sure if this is correct but it does not ICE with this fix: > tree off =3D fold_convert (ptr_type_node, op1); > - return build_fold_addr_expr_loc > - (loc, > + return build1_loc > + (loc, ADDR_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op0), > fold_build2 (MEM_REF, > TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0)), > unshare_expr (op0), off)); >=20 > should actually be:=20=20 > (EXPR_LOCATION(off), ADDR_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (op0), > fold_build2 (MEM_REF, > TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0)), > unshare_expr (op0), off)); Huh? Why do you think that changing the location should fix the ICE? That= 's a completely random change that you never bothered to test, because it doesn't fix the crash.=