public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "r.dilz at tue dot nl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/94221] New: Explicit assignment in type is ignored in some cases
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:23:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-94221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94221

            Bug ID: 94221
           Summary: Explicit assignment in type is ignored in some cases
           Product: gcc
           Version: 9.2.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: r.dilz at tue dot nl
  Target Milestone: ---

When working with types, I found some unexpected behavior. 

It seems that the variables in a type do not get assigned their proper values
reliably. I suspect that the compiler does not check well enough whether a
variable is used or not and the whole assignment is then optimized away.



Below is a minimal example: 

module pyimp
  use iso_c_binding
  type,bind(C) :: container
    integer(C_INT) :: val = 3 !assignment here is not reliable in gfortran
  end type container

  contains

    type(container) function test() bind(c,name='test')
      print*,"running test"
      print*,test%val
    end function test

    type(container) function test2() bind(c,name='test2')
      print*,"running test - here test%val is not initialized"
    end function test2

end module pyimp

program main
  use pyimp
  type(container) :: a
  print*,"First: the test%var is initialized by an extra print statement:"
  a = test()
  print*,a%val
  a = test2()
  print*,"But in test2 it is not: "
  print*,a%val
end program main



Compiled with fortran 4.8 and fortran 9.2.1, both give the same output:



 First: the test%var is initialized by an extra print statement:
 running test
           3
           3
 running test - here test%val is not initialized
 But in test2 it is not: 
           0

Whereas in test2 it should also output 3. Using ifort, I do get the expected
result for test2.

             reply	other threads:[~2020-03-19  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-19  8:23 r.dilz at tue dot nl [this message]
2020-03-19 11:46 ` [Bug fortran/94221] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-94221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).