From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6B4B9385E02B; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:06:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B4B9385E02B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1584954363;
 bh=IJco+PLHS9Q37d/X9QMX7nY9KKqmo0JMgwgPucvzorc=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=Qq+efhyWjDLPdoGbv+hodhndNMCPq1cUcqcN9acNkc8UC/YjcPwo2wqJYNDwwn2fs
 S/iMH9mWAYOpqOyrqB8mjRx/r9nPdtZm6qYIYGWC+KbXkGvGkCP4irwKAkbqF6n4kE
 v4wD0q4Vl9IqI1riaeXW57M/w2vl9jbo95IPn0m4=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/94249] [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests
 FAIL: could not add symbols
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:06:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94249-4-Pe2Lyu1RjD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:06:03 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94249

--- Comment #10 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've got it, sparc64 does not define __BIG_ENDIAN__. I'm testing a patch th=
at
does endianess detection based on __BYTE_ORDER__.=