From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 98A4E385E002; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 18:56:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 98A4E385E002 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1584903370; bh=/Cf6i83mGhJdtfmhhcLLUrJzPwBm8e2wYtHQzKIa+PA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ayt4Rvj21QyFylXil92yiEsEElB2lPqz14NHAJR9/Zy2+l7MZqjyQcxzGys+SrCvB IKhi78pC2iu13T7Vlulnenh3q1sxQrhgNC3pMAndn8n7lw7/OmChgNrLOegMfTuF+i uaKTQRfPtV2rzA7VbqsmOvLetcP+X2T4DtkzpRPo= From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/94249] [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 18:56:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 18:56:10 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94249 --- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #6 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- >> Can you provide some pointers where to look? I'm totally unfamiliar >> with this code. Maybe it's easier for you to try the Solaris/SPARC >> system in the cfarm? No idea if they have Linux/HP-PA there as well... > > Ok, I'll start with that tomorrow in the morning and let you know. Fine, thanks. Just FYI, I built binutils master to check if the issue also exists with the v2 plugin interface. One previously failing testcase now PASSes with gld 2.34.50. I'm now running full bootstraps on both sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11 with that gld. This wouldn't be a solution, of course, just an additional datapoint.=