From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7F0B3385E030; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:39:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7F0B3385E030 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1584967192; bh=TSz7nnJSwbnvGhT+D8wHS/bLI/JH3SCloTLTuOUpPAQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Us+IZ0XFSralwxVGPd2XTV2px1VMADIFTPb18J8skQ8dzdSf+CI7zYc021l5lsq3m lEq76M/lGF6teTG6qW15MpPYF6WEtc/qbeUF4nUxc+u41EGz0QbGepauy07yTIebb0 bjE6fsdyeL4OCgpHQBGXDNSLy1cUbz35Gd0Q75OI= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/94272] [8/9/10 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fnon-call-exceptions since r8-5241 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:39:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:39:52 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94272 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc d= ot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'm afraid this is similar to the PR93786 and I don't have a good solution. This goes wrong during gimplification, we have: if (c !=3D 0B && d !=3D 0) { (void) 0; } else { # DEBUG BEGIN STMT; if (*e !=3D 0) (void) 0; } When we call shortcut_cond_expr, the important difference is that without -= g, TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS on else_ (which is in that case a COND_EXPR) is false, but with -g it is true (else_ is a STATEMENT_LIST with TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS set containing the DEBUG_BEGIN_STMT with TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS false and the COND_E= XPR also with TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS clear. Alex?=