From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 7A5023857836; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:58:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7A5023857836
From: "richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/94295] use __builtin_operator_new and
 __builtin_operator_delete when available
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:58:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94295-4-jPwdtNNM7M@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94295-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94295-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:58:44 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94295

--- Comment #8 from Richard Smith <richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk=
> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> Richard S., is there any reason to use the built-ins for the constant
> evaluation case?

No, Clang's constant evaluator treats the built-ins and calls to replaceable
global [de]allocation functions identically. (The built-ins might be
*marginally* more efficient, but it's not worth an #ifdef.)=