From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 136CF385E00F; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 09:37:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 136CF385E00F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1585129040;
 bh=Gc4Pq5G4IRR2Z2bENfLEehx6xRsTeLdpmlK+3PaiCrU=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=W99POOs7ipIIF8ABcfLa1ZqF/yRM6p8ju3HeNUPH/27wDSmvTvgAIyx23sZiayjfh
 /OyjGsb6XSNesRqIXxOFzH9ogoRjtwQlOJU4uVSIei50qOkTPs5QrvSpcBqlZNneYO
 iOHRQkl7bmD2ngTJ+Lzqyw+XM33En+pA869Iaiyw=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/94307] Provide a way to declare the *SAN exception
 handler -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 09:37:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94307-4-yd2Ebtv9JH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94307-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94307-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 09:37:20 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94307

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Well, they could just make them alias of each other, that is not the big de=
al,
I guess they don't want to waste .rodata space on the data that provides the
details to those functions and waste .text on passing the addresses of such
data to the handlers.  Of course, it would be much harder to understand wha=
t is
going on when the functions don't tell you what exactly went wrong (but tha=
t is
the same with -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error).=